Opinion
2:22-cv-00232-CDS-EJY
10-05-2022
SMART RAIN SYSTEMS, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. ROHREN- UND PUMPENWERK BAUER GES.M.B.H., a limited liability company of Austria; BAUER NORTH AMERICA, INC., a foreign corporation; DOES 1 through 10 Defendants.
CHAD R. FEARS, ESQ. (SBN 6970) EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP MICHAEL S. GOLENSON, ESQ. (PRO HAC VICE TO BE FILED) MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MICHELL, LTD. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS ROHREN -UND PUMPENWERK BAUER GES.M.B.H. AND BAUER NORTH AMERICA, INC. (SIGNED BY FILING ATTORNEY WITH PERMISSION RECEIVED VIA E-MAIL ON OCTOBER 4, 2022) TIMOTHY O. HEMMING, ESQ. (SBN 14375) DENTONS DURHAM JONES PINEGAR P.C. DAVID W. TUFTS, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE) DENTONS DURHAM JONES PINEGAR P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF MICHAEL E. RAWLINS, ESQ. (SBN 5467) DESIGNATED SOLELY FOR SERVICE PURSUANT TO LR IA 11-1(B)
CHAD R. FEARS, ESQ. (SBN 6970)
EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT LLP
MICHAEL S. GOLENSON, ESQ. (PRO HAC VICE TO BE FILED)
MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MICHELL, LTD.
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
ROHREN -UND PUMPENWERK BAUER
GES.M.B.H. AND BAUER NORTH AMERICA, INC.
(SIGNED BY FILING ATTORNEY WITH PERMISSION RECEIVED VIA E-MAIL ON OCTOBER 4, 2022)
TIMOTHY O. HEMMING, ESQ. (SBN 14375)
DENTONS DURHAM JONES PINEGAR P.C.
DAVID W. TUFTS, ESQ. (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)
DENTONS DURHAM JONES PINEGAR P.C.
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
MICHAEL E. RAWLINS, ESQ. (SBN 5467)
DESIGNATED SOLELY FOR SERVICE PURSUANT TO LR IA 11-1(B)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
(FOURTH REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Defendant Bauer North America, Inc. (“Bauer NA”), Defendant Rohren-und Pumpenwerk Bauer Ges.m.b.H. (“Bauer GmbH”) (collectively, “Bauer”), and Plaintiff Smart Rain Systems, LLC (“Smart Rain”), through their respective counsel, that the time for Bauer to respond to the Complaint be extended up to and including November 7, 2022. Bauer's current deadline to respond to the Complaint is October 7, 2022. The additional thirty-one days stipulated to herein allows the parties more time to explore the possibility of an early settlement.
The reason for the extension is not for purposes of delay or to cause prejudice to any party, but rather is to allow the parties to discuss settlement options. This is the parties' fourth request for such an extension from the Court, having had previous extensions granted on June 3, 2022 [Docket 17], August 5, 2022 [Docket 19], and September 7, 2022 [Docket 21]. This request complies with Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.