From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart Local 265 Welfare Fund v. United Bldg. & Energy Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Aug 18, 2021
Civil Action 19 C 3116 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 19 C 3116

08-18-2021

SMART LOCAL 265 WELFARE FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED BUILDING & ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, Defendant.

Cecilia M. Scanlon Attorney for the Plaintiffs BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.


Cecilia M. Scanlon

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

RENEWED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

FRANKLIN U. VALDERRAMA, JUDGE

Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, default having been entered against the Defendant on May 27, 2021 pursuant to FRCP 55(a), request this Court enter judgment against Defendant, UNITED BUILDING & ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, pursuant to FRCP 55(b). In support of this Renewed Motion, Plaintiffs state:

1. On May 8, 2019, a lawsuit was filed. On May 13, 2019, the Summons and Complaint was served on the corporation's registered agent. Therefore, Defendant's answer was due on June 3, 2019.

2. On June 27, 2019, this Court entered default against Defendant and granted Plaintiffs' request for an order directing an audit of the Defendant's payroll books and records for the time period January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018 [Dkt. 9]. The Court also entered an order that judgment would be entered after the completion of the audit.

3. On July 17, 2019, Joseph P. Berglund filed his appearance as counsel for the Defendant [Dkt. 11]. On August 5, 2020, Defendant's answer to Plaintiffs' complaint was electronically filed with this Court [Dkt. 31].

4. On or about January 27, 2020, Plaintiffs' auditors issued the initial audit report. Thereafter, on February 14, 2020, Plaintiffs' auditors issued a revised audit report which did not change the initial amounts due identified in the January 27, 2020 report. The initial and revised audit findings show that the Defendant is delinquent in contributions to the Funds in the amount of $596, 841.29, plus $59, 684.13 for liquidated damages, for a total of $656, 525.42. (See Affidavit of Katie Eby).

5. Plaintiffs' auditing firm of Calibre CPA Group, PLLC charged Plaintiffs $783.75 to perform the audit examination and complete the audit report and revised audit report and the Funds are entitled to recover said fees under their Trust Agreements (Eby Aff. Par. 7).

6. In addition, Plaintiffs' firm has expended $485.00 for costs and $14, 045.50 for attorneys' fees in this matter. (See Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman).

7. In the Court's Notification of Docket Entry issued on March 9, 2021 [Dkt. 35], the Court allowed the Defendant until March 30, 2021 to retain new counsel and the parties were ordered to file a status report by April 12, 2021.

8. As Defendant has failed to retain new counsel and cannot proceed pro se, Plaintiffs respectfully request entry of judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b). Also, see, United States v. Hagerman, 549 F.3d. 536, 538 (7th Cir. 2008) (“The usual course when a litigant not entitled to liltigate pro se loses its lawyer in the midst of the case is to give it a reasonable opportunity to find a new one or enter a default judgment”) (citations omitted).

9. On July 9, 2021, the Court entered and continued Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Judgment and instructed Plaintiffs to file billing records to support the Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman, to file/submit an amended motion and/or an amended proposed judgment order addressing the fact that the total amount in the judgment order does not match the judgment amount stated in the Motion for Entry of Judgment.

10. On July 14, 2021, Plaintiffs' counsel submitted the Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman [Dkt. 48] and attached her firm's billing records. She also submitted an Amended Judgment Order to the Court.

11. On August 13, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Judgment without prejudice on the basis that the amounts requested in Plaintiffs' Motion did not match the total set forth in Plaintiffs' amended judgment order nor did Plaintiffs file a renewed motion.

12. Plaintiffs have remedied the deficiencies noted by the Court and are submitting herewith this Renewed Motion for Entry of Judgment, the Affidavit of Catherine M. Chapman, the Affidavit of Katie Eby supporting the damages claimed by the Plaintiffs and a Final Judgment Order for the Court's review and consideration.

13. Based upon the documents attached hereto, Plaintiffs request entry of judgment in the total amount of $671, 839.67.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter judgment in the amount of $671, 839.67 pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 55(b).


Summaries of

Smart Local 265 Welfare Fund v. United Bldg. & Energy Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Aug 18, 2021
Civil Action 19 C 3116 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Smart Local 265 Welfare Fund v. United Bldg. & Energy Servs.

Case Details

Full title:SMART LOCAL 265 WELFARE FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED BUILDING …

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 19 C 3116 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 18, 2021)