From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smalls v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division
Mar 12, 2009
C/A No. 0:08-cv-211-GRA (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2009)

Summary

affirming a report and recommendation after no objections were filed

Summary of this case from Sherby v. Astrue

Opinion

C/A No. 0:08-cv-211-GRA.

March 12, 2009


ORDER (Written Opinion)


This matter is before the Court for a review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation made in accordance with Local Rule 83.VII.02(A), D.S.C., issued on February 19, 2009. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner, denying his claim for disability benefits and supplemental security income. The magistrate recommends affirming the decision of the Commissioner.

The magistrate makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this Court. Matthews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). This Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is made, and this Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court may also "receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate with instructions." Id. In the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th. Cir. 1983). No objections to the magistrate's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

After a review of the magistrate's Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that the report is based upon the proper law and substantial evidence exists to support the findings. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted by this Court.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smalls v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division
Mar 12, 2009
C/A No. 0:08-cv-211-GRA (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2009)

affirming a report and recommendation after no objections were filed

Summary of this case from Sherby v. Astrue

In Smalls, the court adopted a magistrate's R R that found that reliance on solely the grids was acceptable when a Plaintiff's "nonexertional impairments do not result in sufficiently serious functional limitations that restrict [the Plaintiff's] ability to perform work of which he is exertionally capable."

Summary of this case from Sherby v. Astrue

In Smalls, the ALJ determined that the claimant's medically determinable mental impairments, including depression and deficits in intellectual functioning, did not result in significant limitations on his residual functional capacity to perform medium work.

Summary of this case from Sherby v. Astrue
Case details for

Smalls v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:Leon Smalls, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division

Date published: Mar 12, 2009

Citations

C/A No. 0:08-cv-211-GRA (D.S.C. Mar. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Vanduzer v. Colvin

"[B]efore a claimant's failure to seek treatment can be ignored due to a financial hardship claim, 'all…

Sherby v. Astrue

Therefore, in order to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees, the court must decide…