From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 31, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01075-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01075-REB-CBS

10-31-2013

TYRON DUANTE SMALL, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELISSA YOUNG, DETECTIVE JEFF HUDDLESTON, DETECTIVE MARC CHACON, and OFFICER DANIEL THOMPSON, Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#35], filed October 10, 2013. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).

"[#35]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).
--------

Finding no error, much less plain error, in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that recommendation should be approved and adopted. It is plain from the pleadings that plaintiff's putative claims in this lawsuit are barred by limitations. Thus, the claims, and this case, must be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#35], filed October 10, 2013, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (Pro Se Prisoner) Amended Complaint [#25], filed July 2, 2013, is GRANTED;

3. That Defendant Young's Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Doc. No. 9) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) [#26], filed July 2, 2013, is GRANTED;

4. That plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as barred by limitations;

5. That judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, District Attorney Melissa Young; Detective Jeff Huddleston; Detective Marc Chacon; and Officer Daniel Thompson, against plaintiff, Tyron Duante Small, as to all claims and causes of action asserted against them herein; and

6. That defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the clerk of the court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated October 31, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Small v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 31, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-01075-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Small v. Young

Case Details

Full title:TYRON DUANTE SMALL, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELISSA YOUNG…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 31, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-01075-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

United Sec. Fin. Corp. v. First Mariner Bank

USF is correct that the original counterclaim has been superseded with the filing of an amended counterclaim,…

Carbajal v. Morrissey

" (See Third Am. Compl. ¶¶ 21, 31, 33.) "A claim of abuse of process accrues when plaintiff learns that a…