From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Visinsky

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 6, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-44-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-44-KRG-KAP.

November 6, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The petitioner's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 54, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 22, 2009, docket no. 55, recommending that the motion for reconsideration be denied.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. After an extension of time was granted, plaintiff filed objections, docket no. 58, which are meritless.

Upon de novo review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of November 2009, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 54, is denied.


Summaries of

Small v. Visinsky

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 6, 2009
Case No. 3:08-cv-44-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Small v. Visinsky

Case Details

Full title:ELWOOD SMALL, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, FRED…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 6, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-44-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 6, 2009)