From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Apr 16, 1991
402 S.E.2d 927 (Va. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion


402 S.E.2d 927 (Va.App. 1991) Richard SMALL, t/a Richard Small Paving Company v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. No. 0627-87-1. Court of Appeals of Virginia. April 16, 1991.

        Ronald M. Pearce (Richard M. Bing, Pearces&sBing, on brief, Richmond), for appellant.

        John H. McLees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mary Sue Terry, Atty. Gen., on brief), for appellee.

        Present: KOONTZ, C.J., and BAKER, BARROW, BENTON, COLE, COLEMAN, DUFF, KEENAN, MOON and WILLIS, JJ.

        BARROW, Judge.

        In Small v. Commonwealth, --- Va.App. ----, 398 S.E.2d 98 (1990), a panel of this court held that the defendant's conviction was barred because of double jeopardy. A majority of this court sitting en banc on March 26, 1991, pursuant to the Commonwealth's request for rehearing, determined that the trial court erred for the reasons stated in the panel opinion.

        Chief Judge Koontz, joined by Judges Baker, Cole, and Coleman, would affirm the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in his dissenting panel opinion.

        Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.

        Reversed.


Summaries of

Small v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Apr 16, 1991
402 S.E.2d 927 (Va. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Small v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Richard SMALL, t/a Richard Small Paving Company v. COMMONWEALTH of…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Apr 16, 1991

Citations

402 S.E.2d 927 (Va. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Miller

"It is not the 'fact of punishment but rather its character and purpose' that distinguishes civil and…

Gardner v. Commonwealth

"[I]t is not the 'fact of punishment but rather its character and purpose' that distinguish civil and…