From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 29, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:08cv44/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:08cv44/MCR/MD.

April 29, 2008


ORDER


The defendant having filed his answer (doc. 5) to the complaint and a certified copy of the transcript of the administrative proceedings below, the court believes that the interests of justice would be served by allowing the parties an opportunity to file memoranda in support of their respective positions.

Since the plaintiff has the burden to demonstrate that the defendant's decision to deny benefits was incorrect, the plaintiff has the burden to file the first memorandum. Failure of plaintiff to file such a memorandum which specifically addresses the claimed error shall be deemed to be a failure to prosecute and will result in dismissal of the case with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall have 60 days to file a memorandum not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages in support of his complaint. The memorandum shall set forth the plaintiff's legal contentions and shall specifically cite the record by page number for factual contentions.

2. Defendant shall within thirty (30) days of service of plaintiff's memo file a response, also not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

3. The clerk of court is directed to return this file to the undersigned no later than the due date of defendant's response.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Small v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 29, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:08cv44/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Small v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY SMALL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 29, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:08cv44/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2008)