From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.M. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 14, 2005
890 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 5D04-3440.

January 14, 2005.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus, James E. Henson, Respondent Judge.

Timothy A. Straus of Moyer, Straus Patel, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Petitioner.

Charles D. Peters, Orlando, for Respondent.


S.M. seeks this court to require the lower court to vacate an order entered in a dependency proceeding under which S.M.'s child was placed in emergency, temporary shelter. The sole issue is whether the lower court erred in denying S.M.'s request to present testimonial evidence from a witness who was neither a parent nor legal custodian of the child. We treat the petition as an appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.146 and reverse. Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c). In doing so, we adopt the holding and analysis of the Second District in G.P. v. Family Continuity Program, 875 So.2d 715 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

REVERSED.

SAWAYA, C.J., PLEUS and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

S.M. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 14, 2005
890 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

S.M. v. Dept. of Children Families

Case Details

Full title:S.M., Mother of M.M. a Child, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 14, 2005

Citations

890 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

L.M.C. v. D.C.F.

We have previously held that parents have a constitutional due process and statutory right to present…

L.M.C. v. Department of Children & Families

We have previously held that parents have a statutory right to present evidence contesting probable cause at…