From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.M. v. C.F.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 18, 2015
173 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 2D14–4233.

03-18-2015

S.M., Appellant, v. C.F. and M.F., and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, Second District, and Joseph Thye Sexton, Assistant Regional Counsel, Bartow, for Appellant. Richard Barton Ray, Bradenton, for Appellees C.F. and M.F. Jennifer S. Paullin, Sanford, for Guardian ad Litem Program.


Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, Second District, and Joseph Thye Sexton, Assistant Regional Counsel, Bartow, for Appellant.

Richard Barton Ray, Bradenton, for Appellees C.F. and M.F.

Jennifer S. Paullin, Sanford, for Guardian ad Litem Program.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

S.M. v. C.F.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 18, 2015
173 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

S.M. v. C.F.

Case Details

Full title:S.M., Appellant, v. C.F. and M.F., and Guardian Ad Litem Program…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

173 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)