Opinion
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-03614 PJH
11-16-2011
SYLWESTER SLOJEWSKI Plaintiff(s), v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive Defendant(s).
Peter N. Hadiaris Attorney for Plaintiff SYLWESTER SLOJEWSKI Megan Barker Attorney for Defendant ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
[×] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:
[] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ___ ____________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[] other requested deadline ___
Peter N. Hadiaris
Attorney for Plaintiff
SYLWESTER SLOJEWSKI
Megan Barker
Attorney for Defendant
ALLSTATE INSURANCE
COMPANY
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[] Non-binding Arbitration
[×] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[] Mediation
[] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[] other ___
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton