From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slocumb v. McKie

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division
Jun 3, 2011
C.A. No. 9:10-1605-HMH-BM (D.S.C. Jun. 3, 2011)

Opinion

C.A. No. 9:10-1605-HMH-BM.

June 3, 2011


OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006).

The Petitioner filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The court must "only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).

After a thorough review of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Marchant's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore

ORDERED that Petitioner's habeas petition is granted with respect to Ground Three only and that Petitioner be returned to the state sentencing court for resentencing as directed in the Report and Recommendation. It is further

ORDERED that the remaining claims in the petition be dismissed without prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied with respect to the dismissed claims. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Greenville, South Carolina

June 2, 2011

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The Petitioner is hereby notified that he has the right to appeal this order within thirty (30) days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Slocumb v. McKie

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division
Jun 3, 2011
C.A. No. 9:10-1605-HMH-BM (D.S.C. Jun. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Slocumb v. McKie

Case Details

Full title:Conrad Lamont Slocumb, #197165, aka Conrad L. Slocumb, Petitioner, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division

Date published: Jun 3, 2011

Citations

C.A. No. 9:10-1605-HMH-BM (D.S.C. Jun. 3, 2011)