From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slocum v. Schleicher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Feb 7, 2013
Civil No. 11-cv-317-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-cv-317-PB

02-07-2013

Michael Slocum, Executor Of the Estate of Timothy M. Donovan, et al. v. Alexander Schleicher, GmbH & Co., Segelflugzeugbau


NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 53, Motion to Compel Production of

Certain Documents

Ruling: Based Upon defendant's response to my order of January 31, 2012, see doc. no. 64, plaintiffs' motion to compel is denied as to requests 5, 6, 18, 25, and 27-31, for the reasons given in my previous order (doc. no. 63). Because defendant has withheld no documents based upon its objections, there is nothing for the court to compel.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Landya McCafferty

United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Phillip S. Bixby, Esq.

Roy A. Bourgeois, Esq.

Alisa Brodkowitz, Esq.

Stephen J. Dibble, Esq.

Harold J. Friedman, Esq.

Edward J. Sackman, Esq.

Andru H. Volinsky, Esq.


Summaries of

Slocum v. Schleicher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Feb 7, 2013
Civil No. 11-cv-317-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Slocum v. Schleicher

Case Details

Full title:Michael Slocum, Executor Of the Estate of Timothy M. Donovan, et al. v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 11-cv-317-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 7, 2013)