From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloben v. Pace

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Oct 27, 2021
No. 2D20-3317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2D20-3317

10-27-2021

JAY ANDREW SLOBEN, Appellant, v. JOHN ROCCO PACE, Appellee.

Jay Andrew Sloben, pro se. Chance Lyman of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C., Tampa; and Sandra Ramirez of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C., Miami, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa A. Allen, Judge.

Jay Andrew Sloben, pro se.

Chance Lyman of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C., Tampa; and Sandra Ramirez of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C., Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

BLACK, LUCAS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.


Summaries of

Sloben v. Pace

Florida Court of Appeals, Second District
Oct 27, 2021
No. 2D20-3317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Sloben v. Pace

Case Details

Full title:JAY ANDREW SLOBEN, Appellant, v. JOHN ROCCO PACE, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Second District

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

Citations

No. 2D20-3317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2021)