From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Dec 14, 2016
No. 4D16-2051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D16-2051

12-14-2016

THOMAS MORE SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Thomas More Sloan, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09CF001021A. Thomas More Sloan, Wewahitchka, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Howell v. State, 109 So. 3d 763, 774 (Fla. 2013) ("[C]laims of ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel are not cognizable."). GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Sloan v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Dec 14, 2016
No. 4D16-2051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Sloan v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MORE SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

No. 4D16-2051 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 14, 2016)