From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 10, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2010-162487 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-162487 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-136

04-10-2013

Jack Randy Sloan, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Adam West Lee, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Anderson County

Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge


APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Adam West Lee, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the dismissal of his application for post-conviction relief. The State consents to Petitioner's request for a belated direct appeal. Accordingly, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). Petitioner appeals his convictions of two counts of lewd act upon a child under sixteen, one count of obscene exposure of private parts in a lewd manner, and one count of criminal sexual conduct, arguing the trial court erred in refusing to admit evidence of third-party guilt. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Petitioner's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sloan v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Apr 10, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2010-162487 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Sloan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jack Randy Sloan, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2010-162487 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2013)