From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan v. Renzenberger, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 27, 2011
No. 10-2508-CM-JPO (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-2508-CM-JPO.

October 27, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Plaintiff Johnnyette Sloan, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. On October 13, 2011, the court denied without prejudice the parties' joint motion to approve settlement agreements. (Doc. 117.) The court permitted the parties to amend their joint motion to address particular concerns the court raised in its Order. This matter is now before the court on the parties' Renewed Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreements and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 118).

( See Docs. 1, at 15; 36, at 1-2). Since this action was filed, twenty-one plaintiffs opted-in. Plaintiff Sloan's complaint also asserts a class action under Kansas law for breach of contract; unjust enrichment; and violation of the Kansas Wage Payment Act, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-312, et seq. She also brings individual claims against Renzenberger for violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA").

The court reviewed the renewed motion submitted by the parties, which confirms that the amounts plaintiff Sloan is receiving in satisfaction of her alleged lost wages under the FLSA is comparable to that of the other opt-in plaintiffs. The motion accounts for any apparent discrepancy between the payment to plaintiff and the other opt-in plaintiffs by itemizing the claims to which the payments apply, and explains why the Settlement Agreements, as negotiated, are fair and reasonable for all parties. The court is satisfied that the proposed settlement allocation is fair and reasonable, and hereby approves the Settlement Agreements.

For purposes of settlement, the court certifies, pursuant to Section 216(b) of the FLSA, a collective action consisting of plaintiff Sloan and the individual plaintiffs who have opted into this action, including Asia Blunt, Kiva Bly, Tiauana Burke, Aikeisha Crook, Michelle Fisher, Elizabeth Francis, Deskio Hicks, Amy Hudnall, Shannell Jackson, Tonya Johnson, Lanita Jones, Frances Lowe, Malory Mertz, Amanda Monslow, Mark Moore, Kalieah Mullin, Melissa Munsell, Iona Peavy, Alexa Rivera, Bridget Walker, and Krystal Williams.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' Renewed Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreements and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 118) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are directed to promptly file a stipulation of dismissal, at which time the court will dismiss this action with prejudice, each party to bear his, her, or its own costs.


Summaries of

Sloan v. Renzenberger, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Oct 27, 2011
No. 10-2508-CM-JPO (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Sloan v. Renzenberger, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNYETTE SLOAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

No. 10-2508-CM-JPO (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011)