From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan Steel Erectors Equip. v. Ill. Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 2, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly concluded that a 12-foot-by-31-foot barge is a "watercraft" and that the general contractor's claim for damages against plaintiff arose out of plaintiff's use of a watercraft. Consequently, the allegations of the complaint fall squarely within a policy exclusion and the insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify plaintiff (see, Technicon Elecs. Corp. v American Home Assur. Co., 74 N.Y.2d 66, rearg denied 74 N.Y.2d 893).


Summaries of

Sloan Steel Erectors Equip. v. Ill. Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Sloan Steel Erectors Equip. v. Ill. Union

Case Details

Full title:SLOAN STEEL ERECTORS AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC., Appellant, v. ILLINOIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 136

Citing Cases

Palanquet v. Weeks Marine, Inc.

US Fire argues that Weeks is barred from obtaining additional insured coverage due to the "Watercraft…

First Specialty Ins. v. American Home Assur

Though no Maine case addresses the meaning of this term, persuasive precedent from other jurisdictions…