From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slemmer v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1105 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1105 DAD P.

May 26, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested that this action be dismissed. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), plaintiff's request shall be honored.

Plaintiff is cautioned that the statute of limitations for the bringing of an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in California is two-years. See Maldonado v. Harris, 370 F.3d 945, 954-55 (9th Cir. 2004). However, California prisoners, serving a term of less than life in prison, are entitled to two-years of statutory tolling pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 352.1(a). Moreover, the statute of limitations is tolled while a prisoner completes the process of exhausting administrative remedies. See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir. 2005).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: May 25, 2011.


Summaries of

Slemmer v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 26, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1105 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Slemmer v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL H. SLEMMER, Plaintiff, v. MIKE McDONALD, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1105 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 26, 2011)