From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sleeman v. Reifenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 1982
90 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

November 9, 1982

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Denman and Boomer, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum, and as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: The verdicts in this action for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering are not excessive. The jury's finding that plaintiff's damages should be reduced by $5,000 because of decedent's failure to have used a seat belt must be applied solely in reduction of the verdict for conscious pain and suffering. The judgment must be modified to provide for prejudgment interest on the wrongful death verdict only and not upon the verdict for conscious pain and suffering.


Summaries of

Sleeman v. Reifenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 1982
90 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Sleeman v. Reifenstein

Case Details

Full title:ALAN E. SLEEMAN, SR., as Administrator of the Estate of PATRICK S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1982

Citations

90 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

In re Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001

New York state courts, however, have routinely declined to award prejudgment interest on such claims. See…

In re Joint E. S. Dist.

It is clear that awards for non-economic losses are not entitled to pre-verdict interest. See Chase v. New…