From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sledge v. Lundy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00588-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00588-GBC (PC)

12-11-2012

TONY SLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. J. LUNDY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

I. Procedural History

Plaintiff Tony Sledge ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed the complaint which commenced this action. Doc. 1. On October 31, 2012, the Court dismissed the action and required Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Doc. 10. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state any claims.

More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted (Doc. 1; Doc. 10); and
2. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter judgment against Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sledge v. Lundy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 11, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00588-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Sledge v. Lundy

Case Details

Full title:TONY SLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. J. LUNDY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00588-GBC (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2012)