From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sledge v. Hesson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 21, 2002
291 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

88711

February 21, 2002.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan Jr., J.), entered October 23, 2000 in Tompkins County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion for poor person status.

Ronnie Sledge, Dannemora, appellant pro se.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The underlying facts of this case are set forth in our prior decision ( 274 A.D.2d 777), wherein we concluded that although Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff, a prison inmate, poor person relief, it did err in dismissing the complaint inasmuch as this action for negligence and medical malpractice "was never actually commenced" (id., at 777-778). Upon remittal, plaintiff again applied for poor person relief and also sought leave to amend his complaint. Supreme Court denied the requested relief and plaintiff now appeals.

We affirm. Initially, because this action was not actually commenced, there is no need to seek court approval of any proposed amendment to the complaint. Furthermore, inasmuch as it is clear that plaintiff's action, which stems from the alleged denial of appropriate medical treatment in 1992, is in fact time barred, Supreme Court quite properly denied the application for poor person relief upon the ground that the underlying claims lacked merit. Accordingly, Supreme Court's order is affirmed.

Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Sledge v. Hesson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 21, 2002
291 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Sledge v. Hesson

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE SLEDGE, Appellant, v. DON HESSON, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 21, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 561

Citing Cases

People v. Uhler

With regard to petitioner's argument that Supreme Court should have granted his application for poor person…