From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slayman v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Mar 11, 2009
CASE NO. C09-0232-MAT (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C09-0232-MAT.

March 11, 2009


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING RETURN OF SUMMONS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

(1) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, and to issue summonses to plaintiff's counsel to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is plaintiff's and plaintiff's attorney's responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure .

(2) The Clerk is directed to send to plaintiff's counsel a copy of the Notice of Initial Assignment and Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Slayman v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Mar 11, 2009
CASE NO. C09-0232-MAT (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Slayman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SIHAM M. SLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Mar 11, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C09-0232-MAT (W.D. Wash. Mar. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

White v. Astrue

According to Social Security Ruling 96-3b, "[a] determination that an individual's impairment(s) is not…

Raynn v. Colvin

According to Social Security Ruling 96-3b, "[a] determination that an individual's impairment(s) is not…