From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slay v. Whiteside

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 4, 2003
103 S.W.3d 144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 80452

January 28, 2003 Amended February 4, 2003 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 27, 2003 Application for Transfer Denied May 27, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Philip J. Sweeney, Judge.

Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Brent W. Baldwin, Lathrop Gage, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before Kathianne Knaup Crane, P.J., Glenn A. Norton, J. and Robert E. Crist, Sr. J.



ORDER


Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in defendant's favor. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

Dr. Whiteside's request to dismiss the appeal as frivolous is denied.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Slay v. Whiteside

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 4, 2003
103 S.W.3d 144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Slay v. Whiteside

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE SLAY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. LEO A. WHITESIDE, M.D.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 4, 2003

Citations

103 S.W.3d 144 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)