From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slavicek v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 23, 2010
Civil No. 09-2432 (JNE/FLN) (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-2432 (JNE/FLN).

December 23, 2010


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated December 1, 2010, the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, and that the case be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff objected to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant maintains that it should be adopted. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 24]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 11] is DENIED.
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 19] is GRANTED.
3. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: December 23, 2010


Summaries of

Slavicek v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Dec 23, 2010
Civil No. 09-2432 (JNE/FLN) (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Slavicek v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Jason Joseph Slavicek, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Dec 23, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-2432 (JNE/FLN) (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2010)

Citing Cases

Patton v. Berryhill

"[T]o the extent that the Plaintiff suggests that 437 jobs is [sic] insufficient as a matter of law, his…

Melvin W v. Kijakazi

Slavicek v. Astrue, No. CIV. 09-2432, 2010 WL 5421444, at *21 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2010), report and…