From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaven v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 23, 2021
1:20-cv-00606-AWI-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00606-AWI-JLT (HC)

06-23-2021

LEONARD A. SLAVEN, Petitioner, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

(DOC. 30)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 21, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion to amend. (Doc. 30.) However, on April 28, 2021, the Court issued findings and recommendations to grant Respondent's motion to dismiss and dismiss the habeas corpus petition. (Doc. 29.) Moreover, the Court previously provided Petitioner the opportunity to amend the petition. (See Docs. 20, 22.) Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner's motion to amend.

Petitioner also requests the appointment counsel. (Doc. 30.) There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if “the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Slaven v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 23, 2021
1:20-cv-00606-AWI-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Slaven v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD A. SLAVEN, Petitioner, v. PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00606-AWI-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)