From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. Coleman

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-19 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-19.

June 24, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2011, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Commonwealth's Answer, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, the other documents filed by the parties, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. Petitioner has neither shown a denial of a constitutional right, nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's disposition of his claims. Consequently, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Slaughter v. Coleman

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-19 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Slaughter v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS SLAUGHTER a/k/a BARNSWELL JONES, Petitioner v. BRIAN COLEMAN, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 24, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-19 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2011)