From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jan 22, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19cv779 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19cv779 (DJN)

01-22-2020

BRANDON RAY SLAUGHTER, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the Court on its own initiative. On October 23, 2019, Petitioner Brandon Ray Slaughter ("Petitioner"), a Virginia state prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) By Memorandum Order entered on November 26, 2019, the Court directed Petitioner, within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof, to pay the $5.00 filing fee or explain any special circumstances that would warrant excusing payment of the filing fee. (ECF No. 5.) The Court warned Petitioner that it would dismiss the action if Petitioner did not pay the filing fee or explain any special circumstances that would warrant excusing payment of the filing fee. More than eleven (11) days have elapsed since the entry of the Court's Memorandum Order and Petitioner has not responded. Accordingly, the action will be hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue unless a prisoner makes "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). This requirement is satisfied only when "reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were 'adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4 (1983)). No law or evidence suggests that Petitioner is entitled to further consideration in this matter. A certificate of appealability will be hereby DENIED.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

Let the Clerk file a copy of this Memorandum Opinion, notify all counsel of record, and send a copy to Petitioner at his address of record.

/s/_________

David J. Novak

United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia
Date: January 22, 2020


Summaries of

Slaughter v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jan 22, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:19cv779 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Slaughter v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON RAY SLAUGHTER, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jan 22, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19cv779 (DJN) (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020)