From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slater v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 13, 1989
541 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-911.

April 13, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Michael F. Cycmanick, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Colin Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant's probation. We affirm the lower court's finding that conditions 6 (violation of any state law), 8 (possession of a firearm) and 9 (possession of marijuana) had been violated. However, we amend the order to delete the finding that conditions 1, 13 and 16 were violated. As to condition 1 (failure to timely file a written report), the lower court's written order did not conform to its oral pronouncement. Towson v. State, 382 So.2d 870 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). As to conditions 13 (payment of fees) and 16 (performance of community service), no evidence was adduced at the revocation hearing to support the charges. Jackson v. State, 449 So.2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED as modified.

DANIEL and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Slater v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 13, 1989
541 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Slater v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE LEE SLATER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 13, 1989

Citations

541 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

McMahill v. State

McMahill argues that conditions for which no facts have been adduced at the revocation hearing must be…