Opinion
No. 05-09-00203-CR
Opinion Filed April 29, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F08-52183-K.
Before Justices MOSELEY, BRIDGES, and FILLMORE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Eugina Slater waived a jury and pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver of four or more grams but less than 200 grams of cocaine in a drug free zone. The trial court made an affirmative deadly weapon finding and assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment and a $1500 fine. Slater's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to Slater, and Slater filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and Slater's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.