From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slater v. Clarke

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. C10-5822RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C10-5822RBL.

October 5, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Kevin Burke and Erin Donnelly's Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. #55].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

Under Local Rule 7, motions for reconsideration are disfavored. The court will ordinarily deny such motions in the absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reasonable diligence." Local Rule 7(h). This standard has not been met in this case. Defendants merely restate the same arguments they made in prior filings in this case. Therefore, Defendants Kevin Burke and Erin Donnelly's Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. #55] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Slater v. Clarke

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 5, 2011
Case No. C10-5822RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Slater v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:KAREN SLATER, individually and on behalf of the ESTATE OF BEVERLY JEAN…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. C10-5822RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 5, 2011)