From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slade v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Mar 1, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09CV72, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:03CR1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 1, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09CV72, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:03CR1.

March 1, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On June 16, 2009, the pro se petitioner, Rubin C. Slade, Jr. ("Slade"), filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge David J. Joel for initial screening and a report and recommendation in accordance with Local Rule of Prisoner Litigation 83.09.

Pursuant to Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701, 707 (4th Cir. 2002), on July 9, 2009, the magistrate judge sent Slade a notice warning him that his motion was subject to dismissal as untimely under the one-year statute of limitations set forth in the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). Following that, on September 2, 2009, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R"), in which he recommended that Slade's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody under § 2255 be denied.

The R R also specifically warned Slade that failure to object to the recommendation within ten days of his receipt of the R R would result in the waiver of any appellate rights he might have on this issue. Slade, however, never filed any objections.

The failure to object to the Report and Recommendation not only waives the appellate rights in this matter, but also relieves the Court of any obligation to conduct a de novo review of the issue presented. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-153 (1985); andWells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1997).

The Court, therefore, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Joel in its entirety (dkt. no. 127), DENIES Slade's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody under § 2255 (dkt. no. 121), and ORDERS the case DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and stricken from the Court's docket.

It is so ORDERED.

The Court directs the Clerk to transmit a copy of this Order to counsel of record, and to mail a copy to the pro se petitioner, certified mail, return receipt requested.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Slade v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Mar 1, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09CV72, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:03CR1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Slade v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:RUBIN C. SLADE, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Mar 1, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09CV72, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:03CR1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 1, 2010)