From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slade v. Smith

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2019
No. 19-7377 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-7377

12-20-2019

ARTIS EUGENE SLADE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DONNA M. SMITH, Respondent - Appellee.

Artis Eugene Slade, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:18-hc-02115-BO) Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Artis Eugene Slade, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Artis Eugene Slade, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion to appoint counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slade v. Smith, No. 5:18-hc-02115-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Slade confines his appeal to the district court's ruling dismissing his petition. --------

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Slade v. Smith

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 20, 2019
No. 19-7377 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Slade v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:ARTIS EUGENE SLADE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DONNA M. SMITH, Respondent…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

No. 19-7377 (4th Cir. Dec. 20, 2019)