From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slade v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1903
84 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)

Opinion

May Term, 1903.


Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the court has no jurisdiction of this action against the defendant as executrix, she being a foreign executrix appointed and acting under the laws of the State of Illinois; defendant as such executrix did not waive her objection to the jurisdiction of the court by appearing in the action and demurring for lack of jurisdiction. ( Flandrow v. Hammond, 13 App. Div. 325; Wheelock v. Lee, 74 N.Y. 495.) Also held, that this action is not maintainable against the defendant as executrix of an executor; also held, that the complaint does not state a cause of action against the defendant individually. All concurred.


Summaries of

Slade v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1903
84 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Case details for

Slade v. Hale

Case Details

Full title:William H. Slade, Appellant, v. Gertrude A. Hale, as Executrix, etc., of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1903

Citations

84 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)