From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slade v. DB Mktg. With Ingenuity

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 1, 2022
22 Civ. 358 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 358 (ER)

03-01-2022

LINDA SLADE, Plaintiff, v. DB MARKETING WITH INGENUITY, INC., d/b/a DOLL 10, Defendant.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

foe Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retainjurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next forty-five (45) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Slade v. DB Mktg. With Ingenuity

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 1, 2022
22 Civ. 358 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Slade v. DB Mktg. With Ingenuity

Case Details

Full title:LINDA SLADE, Plaintiff, v. DB MARKETING WITH INGENUITY, INC., d/b/a DOLL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 358 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2022)