From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slade v. City of Marshall Tex.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Aug 4, 2014
Case No. 2:13-CV-1102-RSP (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-CV-1102-RSP

08-04-2014

DOROTHY SLADE, ET AL. v. CITY OF MARSHALL TEXAS, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

For the reasons orally assigned in Open Court on May 28, 2014: (1) all state law claims against the individual officers are dismissed without prejudice by agreement of Plaintiff, to be pursued only against the City of Marshall; (2) the battery claim is not asserted against Defendant TASER, by agreement of Plaintiff; and (3) Plaintiff is Ordered to file an amended complaint concerning the bystander claim on behalf of the decedent's nephew, attempting to cure the issues raised by Defendant in the motion to dismiss, within 10 days, and Defendant may reurge its motion on that issue within 10 days thereafter if deemed appropriate.

SIGNED this 4th day of August, 2014.

/s/________

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Slade v. City of Marshall Tex.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Aug 4, 2014
Case No. 2:13-CV-1102-RSP (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Slade v. City of Marshall Tex.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY SLADE, ET AL. v. CITY OF MARSHALL TEXAS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Date published: Aug 4, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:13-CV-1102-RSP (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2014)