In Slackman v. Kaufman (160 N.Y.S. 786, 789) the court held that "to warrant the laying of a fine to cover the plaintiff's damages, those damages must be proved the same as in an action."
Summary of this case from SAMUELS v. GANZDecember, 1916.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
In Slackman v. Kaufman (160 N.Y.S. 786, 789) the court held that "to warrant the laying of a fine to cover the plaintiff's damages, those damages must be proved the same as in an action."
Summary of this case from SAMUELS v. GANZFull title:HARRY SLACKMAN, Respondent, v. CHARLES KAUFMAN, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1916
(Judiciary Law, § 773.) In Slackman v. Kaufman (160 N.Y.S. 786, 789) the court held that "to warrant the…
Matter of CostIt was their duty to obey the order. The fact that they had an appeal pending is no excuse for their failure…