From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slack v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1107 MCE EFB (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1107 MCE EFB (TEMP)

07-13-2012

KATHERINE SLACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security.


ORDER

Plaintiff filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On June 25, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein (ECF No. 41) which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 25, 2012 (ECF No. 41), are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 35) is DENIED as untimely.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Slack v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1107 MCE EFB (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Slack v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE SLACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1107 MCE EFB (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2012)