From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skubis v. Nationwide Property Cas. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 02-02311

March 21, 2003.

Appeal from those parts of an order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Erie County (Rath, Jr., J.), entered March 1, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendant leave to serve an amended answer.

SHATKIN SHATKIN, BUFFALO (MARC SHATKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (JOSEPH M. SCHNITTER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J. (see Normile v. Allstate Ins. Co., 87 A.D.2d 721, affd 60 N.Y.2d 1003 for reasons stated below, mot to amend remittitur granted on other grounds 61 N.Y.2d 902, 906).


Summaries of

Skubis v. Nationwide Property Cas. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2003
303 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Skubis v. Nationwide Property Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SKUBIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY CASUALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Manrique v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

See id. at *1-2. In that case, the defendant relied on the same cases Defendant does here-namely Normile v.…

Lanzillotta v. GEICO Emps. Ins. Co.

Thus, Defendants' argument is without merit. See, Skubis v. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 303 …