From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skolski v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02377-AP (D. Colo. Dec. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02377-AP

12-27-2012

CHARLES ALEXANDER SKOLSKI, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Michael W. Seckar For Defendant : Daniel E. Burrows Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration


Joint Case Management Plan

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

For Plaintiff: Michael W. Seckar For Defendant: Daniel E. Burrows
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction based on Social Security Act § 205(g), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006).

3. DATES OF FILING RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: September 6, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: October 15, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: December 13, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of their knowledge, the parties believe the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

This case is not on appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: February 1, 2013

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: March 4, 2013

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: March 18, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Parties filing motions for extensions of time or continuances must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(E) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties.

The parties agree that the joint case management plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: ____________
MICHAEL W. SECKAR
402 W 12th St
Pueblo, CO 81003
(719) 543-8636
seckarlaw@mindspring.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
(SIGNED PER ELECTRONIC
AUTHORIZATION)

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA

Assistant United States Attorney

____________

DANIEL E. BURROWS

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Social Security Administration

Office of the General Counsel

1001 17th St

Denver, CO 80202

(303) 844-7356

daniel.burrows@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Skolski v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 27, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02377-AP (D. Colo. Dec. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Skolski v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ALEXANDER SKOLSKI, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 27, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02377-AP (D. Colo. Dec. 27, 2012)