From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skipworth v. Bradshaw

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 6, 2009
CASE NO. 1:08 CV 1154 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 6, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08 CV 1154.

April 6, 2009


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of Magistrate Judge Greg White ( ECF No. 8 ). The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Respondent's motion to dismiss Petitioner Michael Skipworth's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ( ECF No. 1).

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's thorough and well written R R, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in its entirety. Petitioner's habeas petition was filed after the statute of limitations had run and Petitioner has provided no basis for equitable tolling. Moreover, Petitioner, who is represented by counsel, has not replied to Respondent's motion to dismiss and has not filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's R R. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R R and DENIES Petitioner's habeas petition. The above captioned case is hereby ordered dismissed as final. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Skipworth v. Bradshaw

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 6, 2009
CASE NO. 1:08 CV 1154 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Skipworth v. Bradshaw

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SKIPWORTH, Petitioner, v. MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 6, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 1:08 CV 1154 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 6, 2009)