From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skipper v. Hargrove

Superior Court of North Carolina FAYETTEVILLE
Apr 1, 1791
1 N.C. 27 (N.C. Super. 1791)

Summary

In Skipper v. Hargrove, 1 N.C. 27, it was held that where one had wrongfully taken a slave, who died pending the action to recover her, he was liable for her value. It is true that this case was criticised in Bethea v. McLennon, supra, but solely upon the ground that the action was brought in detinue, and not in trover, as in the present case.

Summary of this case from Clark v. Whitehurst

Opinion

(April Term, 1791.)

In detinue, the plaintiff shall have judgment, though the slave for which the action was brought has died since the demand.

Detinue. Non detinet and statute of limitations pleaded. The jury brought the following special verdict:


"The jury sworn, find the defendant doth detain the negroes as set forth in the plaintiff's declaration, to wit, Patience, of the price of two hundred pounds, Ally, of the price of £ 100, and Violet, of the price of £ 100. They further find that the negro Bet, also set forth in the plaintiff's declaration, was at the time demanded, in possession of the defendant, and the property of the plaintiff; that she was demanded of the defendant, who refused to deliver her up, and that she is since dead. If the law is in favor of the plaintiff, they find the defendant doth detain the said negro Bet of the price of £ 50, and if the law is in favor of the defendant, then that she doth not detain the said negro Bet, and assess the plaintiff's damage, to 6 and 6d. costs."

The Court, SPENCER, J., and McCOY, J., gave judgment for the plaintiff.

Overruled: Bethea v. McLennon, 23 N.C. 533.

Cited: Bethea v. McLennon, 23 N.C. 533; Clark v. Whitehurst, 171 N.C. 2; Randolph v. McGowans, 174 N.C. 206.

(28)


Summaries of

Skipper v. Hargrove

Superior Court of North Carolina FAYETTEVILLE
Apr 1, 1791
1 N.C. 27 (N.C. Super. 1791)

In Skipper v. Hargrove, 1 N.C. 27, it was held that where one had wrongfully taken a slave, who died pending the action to recover her, he was liable for her value. It is true that this case was criticised in Bethea v. McLennon, supra, but solely upon the ground that the action was brought in detinue, and not in trover, as in the present case.

Summary of this case from Clark v. Whitehurst
Case details for

Skipper v. Hargrove

Case Details

Full title:SKIPPER v. HARGROVE. — 1 Mart., 74

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina FAYETTEVILLE

Date published: Apr 1, 1791

Citations

1 N.C. 27 (N.C. Super. 1791)

Citing Cases

Randolph v. McGowans

This subject is very fully discussed in a very learned opinion by Lurton, Circuit Judge, in Lumber Co. v.…

Millinery Co. v. Insurance Co.

Hawkins v. Colclonch, 1 Burr., 274-277. While certainty is an essential of a good award and one of its chief…