From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SKIPPER v. BASF CORP

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division
May 5, 2011
Case No. CV411-082 (S.D. Ga. May. 5, 2011)

Summary

granting motion for leave to proceed IFP but dismissing case as untimely because plaintiff filed complaint more than 90 days after receipt of EEOC letter

Summary of this case from Smith v. Zaxby's Franchising LLC

Opinion

Case No. CV411-082.

May 5, 2011


ORDER


After a careful de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

SKIPPER v. BASF CORP

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division
May 5, 2011
Case No. CV411-082 (S.D. Ga. May. 5, 2011)

granting motion for leave to proceed IFP but dismissing case as untimely because plaintiff filed complaint more than 90 days after receipt of EEOC letter

Summary of this case from Smith v. Zaxby's Franchising LLC
Case details for

SKIPPER v. BASF CORP

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. SKIPPER, Plaintiff, v. BASF CORP, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division

Date published: May 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV411-082 (S.D. Ga. May. 5, 2011)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Zaxby's Franchising LLC

Plaintiff does not state when she received her right-to-sue letter, so the Court presumes she received it 3…