From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skipper et al. v. Handley

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 19, 1930
126 So. 386 (Fla. 1930)

Opinion

Opinion filed February 19, 1930.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; M. G. Rowe, Judge.

Kay, Adams, Ragland Kurz, for Appellants;

Hull, Landis Whitehair, for Appellee.


The orders herein appealed from were affirmed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick, 93 Fla. 114, 111 So. R. 538; Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140, 115 So. R. 527, and not within the rules stated in Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla. 279, 97 So. R. 714; 35 A. L. R. 271; 90 Fla. 621, 106 So. R. 424. It is therefore considered, ordered and decreed that the former decree herein reversing the orders appealed from is vacated and it is now ordered and decreed that the orders appealed from are hereby affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur.

ELLIS AND BUFORD, J. J., dissent.


Summaries of

Skipper et al. v. Handley

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 19, 1930
126 So. 386 (Fla. 1930)
Case details for

Skipper et al. v. Handley

Case Details

Full title:G. B. SKIPPER et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT HANDLEY, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Feb 19, 1930

Citations

126 So. 386 (Fla. 1930)
126 So. 386
126 So. 286
98 Fla. 1256

Citing Cases

Barnett v. Dollison

There is nothing to foreclose. See also Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140, 115 So. 527. Skipper v. Handley, 99…