From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinner v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 13, 2012
3:12-cv-00271-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 13, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-cv-00271-HDM-WGC

06-13-2012

PAUL A. SKINNER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GREG SMITH, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This closed action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by an inmate. After judgment was entered in this action, petitioner filed a motion to extend the prison copywork limit. Because this case is closed, petitioner's motion is denied as moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to extend the prison copywork limit (ECF No. 6) is DENIED.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Skinner v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 13, 2012
3:12-cv-00271-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Skinner v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:PAUL A. SKINNER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GREG SMITH, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 13, 2012

Citations

3:12-cv-00271-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 13, 2012)