From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinner v. Skinner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 7, 1996
921 S.W.2d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 68377.

May 7, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY; JEFF W. SCHAEPERKOETTER, JUDGE.

Daniel E. Leslie, Union, for appellant.

Gael Davis Wood, James W. McGettigan, Jr., Washington, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, and GRIMM, JJ.


Pursuant to Rule 74.06(b), husband filed a motion to set aside the judgment dissolving his marriage. The trial court denied the motion and husband appeals. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Skinner v. Skinner

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 7, 1996
921 S.W.2d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Skinner v. Skinner

Case Details

Full title:LINDA M. SKINNER, PETITIONER/RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS D. SKINNER…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 7, 1996

Citations

921 S.W.2d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)