From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinner v. Fasciano

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 13, 1956
135 N.E.2d 267 (Ohio 1956)

Opinion

No. 34806

Decided June 13, 1956.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Support of Dependents Act — Sections 3115.01 to 3115.10, inclusive, Revised Code — Statutory construction — Suit for support and reimbursement — Evidence — Due process — Section 16, Article 1, Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Messrs. Horn Pasquale, for appellee.

Messrs. Leanza, Bernard Hodous and Mr. Robert F. Longano, for appellant.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skinner v. Fasciano

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 13, 1956
135 N.E.2d 267 (Ohio 1956)
Case details for

Skinner v. Fasciano

Case Details

Full title:SKINNER, APPELLEE v. FASCIANO, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 13, 1956

Citations

135 N.E.2d 267 (Ohio 1956)
135 N.E.2d 267

Citing Cases

State, ex Rel. Stobie v. Stobie

There have been but few Ohio pronouncements concerning the support of dependents law. Judge Skeel, presently…

San Diego v. Elavsky

The resolution of this issue basically involves an interpretation of R.C. 3115.27 and 3115.28. In…