From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinner v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jan 12, 2012
No. 11-CV-710-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-710-PHX-GMS

01-12-2012

Eric J. Skinner, Plaintiff, v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated (MERS), Defendants.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. (Doc. 21). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's motion is denied.

Plaintiff's motion is entitled "Motion for New Trial." (Doc. 21). The essence of Plaintiff's motion, however, is that the Court erred in granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (See Doc. 19). The Court therefore treats Plaintiff's motion as a motion for reconsideration.

Generally, motions to reconsider are appropriate only if the Court "(1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). A motion for reconsideration should not be used to ask a court "to rethink what the court had already thought through, rightly or wrongly." Above the Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannon Roofing, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 99, 101 (E.D.Va. 1983)). Rather, such arguments should be directed to the court of appeals. Sullivan v. Faras-RLS Group, Ltd., 795 F.Supp. 305, 309 (D. Ariz. 1992). Plaintiff raises no argument in his motion for reconsideration that he did not raise earlier. (See Doc. 21). Instead, Plaintiff essentially asks the court to rethink its decision. (Id.). Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is therefore denied.

Plaintiff further asserts that the Court erred by not granting his request for oral argument. (Doc. 21 at 12). The Court did not grant oral argument, however, because the Court determined that oral argument would not aid in its decision. See Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group v. Pac. Malibu Dev., 933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 21) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action.

____________

G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Skinner v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jan 12, 2012
No. 11-CV-710-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Skinner v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:Eric J. Skinner, Plaintiff, v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

No. 11-CV-710-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. Jan. 12, 2012)