From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skillern v. Edenfield

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
Sep 13, 2011
Case No. CV611-101 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV611-101.

September 13, 2011


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Warren Skillern, a convicted rapist and child molester currently incarcerated at the Georgia State Prison in Reidsville, Georgia, has filed yet another in a long series of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints and motions to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). Docs. 1 2. He seeks to sue judges on this Court for abridging his access to the courts. Doc. 1. Plaintiff is barred from proceeding IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)'s "three strikes" provision, so his complaint should be DISMISSED without prejudice. To that end, he does not even bother to acknowledge, much less attempt to satisfy, § 1915(g)'s "imminent danger" exception.

As noted in Skillern v. Wood, C411-121 (S.D. Ga. May 19, 2011), "[h]e is listed as a party in 191 separate cases and has exceeded the statutorily permitted three strikes by a wide margin." Id. doc. 3 at 1 n. 1; see also Skillern v. Georgia State Patrol, 2011 WL 3841279 (S.D. Ga. Aug. 29, 2011); Skillern v. Gordon County Dist. Atty., 2011 WL 2971174 (S.D. Ga., Jul. 20, 2011) (additional § 1915(g)-dismissed cases).

The Chief Judge may want to consider applying to this inmate what the Supreme Court just did to another inmate before this Court: A filing fee bar. Bazemore v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 2889, 2889 (2011) ("As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) ( per curiam)"); see also Smith v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 369 F. App'x 36, 40 (11th Cir. 2010) (injunction prohibiting state prisoner from filing IFP petitions in civil cases litigated in federal court was not overbroad, where prisoner was not prohibited from actions in which he paid the appropriate fees, from criminal cases, or from litigating in state courts), applied in Harris v. St. Lawrence, CV410-047, doc. 3 (S.D. Ga. May 12, 2010); Quaterman v. Quarterman, 2010 WL 4790785 at * 2 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 7, 2010) ( "Smith warning" issued), adopted, 2010 WL 4789007 (S.D. Ga. Nov 17, 2010); Wilkerson v. Statesboro Police Dept., 2009 WL 4609603 at * 2 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 2, 2009) (serial filer "barred from filing any more lawsuits until she first posts a $100 frivolity bond, from which the Court will subtract $100 for the next frivolous lawsuit that she files.").

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.


Summaries of

Skillern v. Edenfield

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division
Sep 13, 2011
Case No. CV611-101 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Skillern v. Edenfield

Case Details

Full title:WARREN SKILLERN, Plaintiff, v. B. AVANT EDENFIELD; JAMES GRAHAM, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV611-101 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 13, 2011)