From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skiko v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2012
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00638 JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00638 JLT

04-02-2012

TERRY L. SKIKO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME


(Doc. 22)

Parties have stipulated by counsel to extend the briefing schedule set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order. (Doc. 22). The Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties, beyond which the parties must demonstrate good cause for further extension. (Doc. 9-1 at 4). Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant's opposition shall be filed no later than May 2, 2012; and

2. Plaintiff's brief in reply shall be filed no later than May 16, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Skiko v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2012
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00638 JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Skiko v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TERRY L. SKIKO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00638 JLT (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2012)