From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 10, 2019
925 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2019)

Opinion

No. 16-56057 No. 16-56287

06-10-2019

Michael SKIDMORE, AS TRUSTEE FOR the RANDY CRAIG WOLFE TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Led ZEPPELIN; James Patrick Page; Robert Anthony Plant; John Paul Jones; Super Hype Publishing, Inc. ; Warner Music Group Corporation ; Warner Chappell Music, Inc.; Atlantic Recording Corporation; Rhino Entertainment Company, Defendants-Appellees. Michael Skidmore, as Trustee for the Randy Craig Wolfe Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc, Defendant-Appellant. and Led Zeppelin; James Patrick Page; Robert Anthony Plant; John Paul Jones; Super Hype Publishing, Inc. ; Warner Music Group Corporation, Atlantic Recording Corporation; Rhino Entertainment Company, Defendants


ORDER

:Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Collins did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.


Summaries of

Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 10, 2019
925 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2019)
Case details for

Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SKIDMORE, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RANDY CRAIG WOLFE TRUST…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 10, 2019

Citations

925 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2019)

Citing Cases

Skidmore v. Zeppelin

We granted rehearing en banc.Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin , 905 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2018), reh'g en banc granted…

Ellis v. Harrison

The district court determined that Ellis’s Sixth Amendment claim lacked merit and denied the petition, and a…